[personal profile] redgirl
I've been thinking about identities a bit lately, mostly catalyzed by friends of mine engaging me in discussion about the difference between pseudonyms and identities. As I see it, pseudonyms are separate names for the same underlying identity, whereas identities are actually separate _people_ somehow. Under this set of definitions, I go to some pains to maintain multiple separate _identities_, with each identity being more or less a logically separate person. In my head, identities are mapped one-to-one onto PGP keys, more or less; as a consequence, my work persona (and corresponding work public key) is literally a separate persona from my private personae (and their public keys).

I think that this is how all identities should work everywhere (including meatspace): identity is keypair, with new identities able to be conjured at will. Cryptography makes identities unforgeable (more or less) and non-repudiable, while still allowing different identities for different contexts. I think sometimes about what it would be like to have a coprocessor in my head that could do cryptographic operations and secure key storage for me - if I could store a few keypairs and various other cryptographic information in my head, I'd definitely do it.

Actually, that's sort of an interesting question: if you had a coprocessor in your head with reasonable amounts of storage and computational power (bearing in mind that you are dissipating heat into your own body, and drawing power from it or something), what would you do? I'd store keys first of all (identity keys, probably a half-dozen or so of the most important/regularly-used ones, then some symmetric keys for backup tarballs in well-known places), then probably an indexed, searchable survival manual (personal preservation :)) and a dump of as much of civilization's total knowledge as possible (how much *is* that, anyway?). Being able to write code without any external hardware would be _extremely_ neat.

To come back to my point, the idea I like here is voluntary, free, durable pseudonymity, backed up by a petname system (i.e., my key can have attached metadata saying "I desire to be known as redgirl", to be presented to a recipient for local name<->key binding, or overruled). Really, I think this is the way social interaction should be done.

Date: 2011-07-29 05:09 am (UTC)
sixolet: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sixolet
Hmm. While I understand that some people want separable identities, what I want is definitely in the "pseudonym" part of that space. I'm very much not a different person in different contexts; while I may have certain boundaries around certain contexts (I don't really want to talk about kink at work), I've very much the same identity. And the me that you see here, or on IRC, or whatever, is very much the same me you get in person.

And how you think about your theoretical coprocessor is very different from how I'd think about mine. It turns out, "verify that this piece of information really came from me", or "make it so that only this one person can read this" -- while they're both things I occasionally have call to do, normal social interaction doesn't have me doing them very often. I'd probably keep a set of photos that I take with my camera-eyes (I get camera-eyes, right?), automatically OCR'd and searchable, of course, to help me remember things. Then a mental journal. Then keys, survival, music, and wikipedia, pretty much in that order. (Perhaps I am forgetting a thing or three)

Though I admit the wisdom of keeping one's keypairs as close as possible, so as not to be stolen.

Also, I want to be able to code with my brainwaves. That'd be great for my wrists. (Then again, maybe I'd discover some kind of brain-RSI. That'd suck.)


August 2011

 1 23456

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 18th, 2017 02:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios